Author: Vid NukalaÂ
Traversing biomedical science, technology & innovation, policy, and diplomacy
2022
Note: This article is a part of the publication ‘Science diplomacy capacity development: Reflections on Diplo’s 2021 course and the road ahead’
Throughout my career, I have been drawn to international collaboration and cooperation in the scientific enterprise—what has recently been termed ‘Science Diplomacy’. This is perhaps due to my realisation that scientists predominantly work in international teams, whether they are within, across, or without borders. Yet, they can have a significant impact on what we know about the human body and mind, nature, and the universe, and how we see and shape the society around us. Â
Curiosity-driven open-sky research, or development towards specific goals, have given us the internet, vaccines, the international space station, but also the nuclear bomb. Most pressingly, the COVID-19 pandemic, conflicts over natural resources, climate change, and other UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) of Agenda 2030 continue to impact and are impacted by Science Diplomacy.
The purpose of Science Diplomacy is manifold. During times of peace, it could foster bilateral or multilateral accords and cooperation on mutually agreed interests on land, under water, or in space. It also keeps communication-channels across opposing sides open, or provides refuge to scientists escaping conflict. Science Diplomacy, when linked to SDGs, can increase the quality of life in developing countries through funding, technology transfer, or capacity building. When the ramifications of dual-use research are fully taken into account, it could help prevent human-made accidental or intentional catastrophes.
Over the past 15 years, working in academia, not-for-profit, philanthropy, and government (bilateral and regional) in Indian, U.S., and European ecosystems, I have been a ‘boundary spanner’ traversing biomedical science, technology & innovation, policy, and diplomacy (STI-Pol-Dip). Surrounded by biomedical STI and health diplomats, I interact with governmental and non-governmental actors, understanding how they influence each other, and work on the policies and processes to operationalize international cooperation. Â
In advancing global health within SDG 3, I have had the opportunity to work on emerging and converging biomedical and health technologies, air quality and health, traditional medicine and access to medical products, global health security, and women in STEMM, among others, that cut across the SDGs. Much of this work falls under ‘diplomacy for science’ and ‘science for diplomacy’, to enable access to, promotion of, and influence for STI.Â
Building on these experiences, I am now keen on engaging the lifesciences community across countries with varying levels of maturity in their research and policy ecosystems. It is not only important for researchers to understand the utility of policy and diplomacy, but also to actively contribute to the issues that impact their work and the world. I intend to draw upon the significant repository of knowledge and expertise within this community, while ensuring diversity and inclusivity in participation. Anticipation of STI informs and helps us prepare for optimal Pol-Dip responses. Therefore, incorporating foresight studies, landscape reviews, as well as analyses of ethical, legal, and social issues of emerging and converging STI into ongoing and future policy work is essential. Â
A key component would be capacity building for those among the community expressing an interest in STI-Pol-Dip. With an emphasis on equitable participation, I would like to enable them by equipping them with knowledge and skills of a science policymaker/diplomat through training workshops and immersion visits. By facilitating connections with policy and diplomatic institutions and networks beyond borders, I hope to contribute towards building a cohesive, resourceful, reliable, and engaged lifesciences community. This would firmly establish it as a key actor in the multilateral STI-Pol-Dip arena.
Strengthening the linkage among STI-Pol-Dip is essential to address global challenges. At the same time, the directionality of STI-Pol-Dip discourse—disproportionately from the ‘Global North’ to the ‘Global South’—its disparities in resources available for scholarship, training, or practice of STI-Pol-Dip, metrics of measuring success, and understanding its limitations, all merit further investigation.
You may also be interested in
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
In his paper, Robert Alston travels through time to rekindle an important highlight – as well as a personal highlight – in the history of knowledge management. His journey takes him back to the 1850s, which saw Antonio Panizzi’s efforts in creating a universal repository of knowledge in the British Museum; and to the 1990s, a time in which he acquired first-hand experience at the same museum, drawing conclusions on the various available ways of navigating large bibliographical and archival databases.
Knowledge management in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Malta
In this paper, Maltese diplomat Gaetan Naudi explains how the Maltese MFA embraced the changes introduced by the informatics era. He looks at such changes from a business management perspective, to show how ICTs were introduced to such a fairly large organisation, the concerns raised by the changes, and the progress on computerised knowledge management. He concludes that despite the positive changes introduced thanks to ICTs, this would not have been possible without human involvement.
Science diplomacy capacity development
Diplo has a track record of more than 20 years of capacity development in diplomacy. Given the increasing relevance of science diplomacy, expanding our program to include aspects of its theory and practice felt like an organic development. We offered our ten-week Science Diplomacy course for the first time in October 2021.
Knowledge and Diplomacy
Knowledge and Diplomacy presents papers on knowledge and knowledge management from the January 1999 Conference on Knowledge and Diplomacy in Malta. The papers in this book, examining the topic from a variety of backgrounds, academic interests and orientations, reflect the multidisciplinary character of knowledge management. This publication is only available online.
Knowledge and Diplomacy – Alex Sceberras Trigona
In his paper, Alex Sceberras Trigona stresses the importance of the diplomatic document as a primary source of diplomatic knowledge, in the light of the distinction between ‘information’ (can be recorded) and knowledge (not easily recorded), the flow of knowledge as information. He then explains the need for dissecting diplomatic documents, and the various level of analysis which are possible, and the effects of digitalisation on knowledge, information and diplomacy.
DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats
On Diplo’s blog, in Diplo’s classrooms, and at Diplo’s events, dialogues stretch over a series of entries, comments, and exchanges and may even linger. DiploDialogue summarises. It’s like in sports events: DiploDialogue aims to bring focus by deleting what, in hindsight, is less relevant. In this first DiploDialogue, Katharina Höne and Aldo Matteucci discuss the usefulness of analogies and metaphors for understanding international relations and diplomacy.
The role of knowledge in the cyber-age of globalisation
In his paper, Richard Falk reflects on the application of information technology on diplomacy, and discusses the challenge of converting information technology to ‘knowledge technology’, and subsequently to ‘wisdom technology’. Yet, the ‘crossroads in human experience’ brings many challenges and dangers which the author analyses.
Knowledge management: experience from international organisations
In this chapter, John Pace decribes the three-phase evolution of knowledge management in the human rights program of the United Nations. The realisation that knowledge management is a necessity came during the third phase. The author also describes the complex system of monitoring bodies and ad hoc mechanisms, and the developments that took place following four decisions taken in the mid-eighties.
Knowledge management and diplomacy
In this paper we aim to provide a comprehensive introduction to the topic of knowledge management in diplomacy. First we provide working definitions of knowledge and knowledge management, and examine the evolution of the concepts. Next, we consider specific features of diplomacy that affect and limit the way knowledge management can be implemented. Then we look at specific techniques which diplomacy can adapt from the business sector in the field of knowledge management. Finally, we consider some important questions related to human resources and knowledge management.
Knowledge management and diplomatic training – new approaches for training institutions
Dietrich Kappeler analyses the new approaches for training institutions in knowledge management and diplomatic training, departing from the premise that a distinction is important between personal characteristics and qualities of the diplomat on one hand, and the knowledge and skills he needs to do his job on the other.
Science & Diplomacy: How countries interact with the Boston innovation ecosystem
Crucial global topics are becoming increasingly dependent on the world’s rapidly changing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities: from global health to digital society, sustainability to development, and beyond. To tackle this growing complexity, countries increasingly seek to engage with international science and technology hubs like Boston, so as to accelerate their ability to innovate and spark collaborative efforts with other nations.
Knowledge management and international development – the role of diplomacy
In this chapter, Walter Fust talks about the role of knowledge management, and knowledge for development, in diplomacy. He describes various methods to assess what knowledge should be stocked, and explains the need for managers who are assigned the task of deciding what should be stocked. These decisions need to be guided by principles, or guidelines - referred to as value management.
Knowledge management and change in international organisations: Learning from the private sector
In this paper, John Harper and Jennifer Cassingena Harper talk about knowledge as a vital resource, and the necessity of building competencies and establishing new skills. Analysing the theories by Ernst B. Haas in When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organisation, the authors trace the development of knowledge-oriented activities in the private sector, and its implications for organisations in the public and international domain.
How do you know what you think you know?
In his paper, J. Thomas Converse focuses on four records-related areas where the issues of knowledge management and diplomacy come together and provide the greatest challenges to archivists, diplomats, historians and technology providers: validation, trustworthiness, context and longevity. He also explores some of the changes and challenges brought about by technology, and urges for a continued embrace of technology, while at the same time demanding the validating and relational functions which give archives their trustworthiness.
