Note: This article is a part of the publication ‘Science diplomacy capacity development: Reflections on Diplo’s 2021 course and the road ahead’
The complexity of contemporary global challenges has increased the need and space for Science Diplomacy. Beyond being a fashionable concept in current multilateral diplomacy, the concept of Science Diplomacy represents a fundamental trend that could contribute to reshaping and reinforcing international cooperation. As an approach that enables the development and implementation of policies based on scientific evidence, Science Diplomacy could contribute to alleviating the consequences of present-day major challenges, from armed conflicts, climate change and loss of biodiversity, to inequalities and global health issues.
 The establishment of a common vision and shared priority between states is increasingly challenging. Global governance is fragmented with interest groups and alliances. In addition, states have less and less of a monopoly on international relations: new actors, such as private companies or transnational political movements, have a growing influence. Against this backdrop, Science Diplomacy is about creating the appropriate conditions for policymakers to understand scientists’ insights and for scientists to comprehend policy and political challenges. However, it not only concerns policymakers and scientists: a whole-of-society approach is needed for Science Diplomacy to be effective.
 Switzerland, as a Host-State of international organizations, supports a number of platforms, which offer a neutral space for collective brainstorming and exchanges outside of formal settings, where stakeholders explore and test new ideas, share good practices, or discuss emerging issues. There are currently seventeen platforms of various sizes, covering issues ranging from human rights to the environment.
Each platform is community-driven and tailor-made to specific needs. Platforms bring together a diversity of stakeholders with an inclusive approach. They build communities, clusters of experts, and networks within Geneva, while bridging the gap with other centers of global governance and with the field. Geneva Platforms also act as knowledge hubs, providing training, conducting research and disseminating information. These activities contribute to achieving more trust between actors, building innovative partnerships, connecting knowledge, generating new thinking, and improving implementation of negotiated documents.Â
An excellent illustration of a Geneva Platform that contributes to building the field of Science Diplomacy is the Geneva Science-Policy Interface (GSPI), hosted by the University of Geneva. Backed by leading European research institutions. GSPI strives to enhance scientific engagement with global governance actors within the Geneva ecosystem, aiming to facilitate the emergence of effective policy and strategy solutions to complex problems.
I am convinced that Science Diplomacy is a fundamental trend that will stay with us for the coming decades, as we are witnessing a convergence of sciences that allows unimaginable scientific discoveries and technological breakthroughs. Current scientific revolutions will soon change the world. With the advent of digital technology, artificial intelligence, and robotics, human life is changing and global governance systems will have to adjust accordingly.
We need to connect scientists and policymakers on the one hand to solve current issues, and on the other hand to create mechanisms through which we can anticipate emerging issues to avoid any misuses of new technologies and to ensure that they are used for the common good of humankind. This is why the Swiss Government and the Canton of Geneva decided three years ago to launch the Geneva Science Diplomacy Anticipator (GESDA). The initiative was prompted by a growing awareness of the rapidly accelerating pace of scientific and technological breakthroughs. As a matter of fact, humanity is left with less and less time to adapt to new realities and create the legal frameworks and standards needed to regulate them.
You may also be interested in
The role of knowledge in the cyber-age of globalisation
In his paper, Richard Falk reflects on the application of information technology on diplomacy, and discusses the challenge of converting information technology to ‘knowledge technology’, and subsequently to ‘wisdom technology’. Yet, the ‘crossroads in human experience’ brings many challenges and dangers which the author analyses.
Science & Diplomacy: How countries interact with the Boston innovation ecosystem
Crucial global topics are becoming increasingly dependent on the world’s rapidly changing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities: from global health to digital society, sustainability to development, and beyond. To tackle this growing complexity, countries increasingly seek to engage with international science and technology hubs like Boston, so as to accelerate their ability to innovate and spark collaborative efforts with other nations.
Knowledge management and international development – the role of diplomacy
In this chapter, Walter Fust talks about the role of knowledge management, and knowledge for development, in diplomacy. He describes various methods to assess what knowledge should be stocked, and explains the need for managers who are assigned the task of deciding what should be stocked. These decisions need to be guided by principles, or guidelines - referred to as value management.
Knowledge management in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Malta
In this paper, Maltese diplomat Gaetan Naudi explains how the Maltese MFA embraced the changes introduced by the informatics era. He looks at such changes from a business management perspective, to show how ICTs were introduced to such a fairly large organisation, the concerns raised by the changes, and the progress on computerised knowledge management. He concludes that despite the positive changes introduced thanks to ICTs, this would not have been possible without human involvement.
Knowledge management and diplomacy
In this paper we aim to provide a comprehensive introduction to the topic of knowledge management in diplomacy. First we provide working definitions of knowledge and knowledge management, and examine the evolution of the concepts. Next, we consider specific features of diplomacy that affect and limit the way knowledge management can be implemented. Then we look at specific techniques which diplomacy can adapt from the business sector in the field of knowledge management. Finally, we consider some important questions related to human resources and knowledge management.
Science diplomacy capacity development
Diplo has a track record of more than 20 years of capacity development in diplomacy. Given the increasing relevance of science diplomacy, expanding our program to include aspects of its theory and practice felt like an organic development. We offered our ten-week Science Diplomacy course for the first time in October 2021.
Knowledge management and change in international organisations: Learning from the private sector
In this paper, John Harper and Jennifer Cassingena Harper talk about knowledge as a vital resource, and the necessity of building competencies and establishing new skills. Analysing the theories by Ernst B. Haas in When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organisation, the authors trace the development of knowledge-oriented activities in the private sector, and its implications for organisations in the public and international domain.
DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats
On Diplo’s blog, in Diplo’s classrooms, and at Diplo’s events, dialogues stretch over a series of entries, comments, and exchanges and may even linger. DiploDialogue summarises. It’s like in sports events: DiploDialogue aims to bring focus by deleting what, in hindsight, is less relevant. In this first DiploDialogue, Katharina Höne and Aldo Matteucci discuss the usefulness of analogies and metaphors for understanding international relations and diplomacy.
Knowledge management: experience from international organisations
In this chapter, John Pace decribes the three-phase evolution of knowledge management in the human rights program of the United Nations. The realisation that knowledge management is a necessity came during the third phase. The author also describes the complex system of monitoring bodies and ad hoc mechanisms, and the developments that took place following four decisions taken in the mid-eighties.
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
In his paper, Robert Alston travels through time to rekindle an important highlight – as well as a personal highlight – in the history of knowledge management. His journey takes him back to the 1850s, which saw Antonio Panizzi’s efforts in creating a universal repository of knowledge in the British Museum; and to the 1990s, a time in which he acquired first-hand experience at the same museum, drawing conclusions on the various available ways of navigating large bibliographical and archival databases.
How do you know what you think you know?
In his paper, J. Thomas Converse focuses on four records-related areas where the issues of knowledge management and diplomacy come together and provide the greatest challenges to archivists, diplomats, historians and technology providers: validation, trustworthiness, context and longevity. He also explores some of the changes and challenges brought about by technology, and urges for a continued embrace of technology, while at the same time demanding the validating and relational functions which give archives their trustworthiness.
Knowledge management and diplomatic training – new approaches for training institutions
Dietrich Kappeler analyses the new approaches for training institutions in knowledge management and diplomatic training, departing from the premise that a distinction is important between personal characteristics and qualities of the diplomat on one hand, and the knowledge and skills he needs to do his job on the other.
Knowledge and Diplomacy – Alex Sceberras Trigona
In his paper, Alex Sceberras Trigona stresses the importance of the diplomatic document as a primary source of diplomatic knowledge, in the light of the distinction between ‘information’ (can be recorded) and knowledge (not easily recorded), the flow of knowledge as information. He then explains the need for dissecting diplomatic documents, and the various level of analysis which are possible, and the effects of digitalisation on knowledge, information and diplomacy.
Knowledge and Diplomacy
Knowledge and Diplomacy presents papers on knowledge and knowledge management from the January 1999 Conference on Knowledge and Diplomacy in Malta. The papers in this book, examining the topic from a variety of backgrounds, academic interests and orientations, reflect the multidisciplinary character of knowledge management. This publication is only available online.
