Piercing the fog of ambiguities
DeepDipThe text delves into the complexities of disambiguation in anthropology and the evolution of morals, cautioning against projecting present understanding onto the past. It warns that disambiguation may not lead to truth but rather to contingent outcomes based on accepted opinions. The process is described as a continual challenge to common sense and can lead to a deeper but more complex understanding, rather than an absolute truth. The author also critiques the practice of searching for predetermined answers in historical texts, emphasizing the ambiguity of the past over its authenticity.
Can we persuade Martians?
DeepDipThe complexity of persuasion is explored in the context of human evolution and socialization, highlighting the role of internalized rules and emotional ties. Unlike apes or Martians, humans have a unique relationship with rules, rooted in conscience. Persuasion involves establishing emotional connections to shared rules beyond calculation, aiming for long-term cooperation. Conflict resolution between groups requires the internalization of common rules to create stability. Unlike apes or Martians, humans display a capacity for persuasion driven by emotional commitment to shared rules.
Is “proportionality in war” OK?
DeepDipA landmark document called the Tallinn Manual on Cyber Warfare sets rules for international cyberwarfare based on existing laws of conventional war. It emphasizes the importance of proportionality to avoid unnecessary loss of life, drawing parallels with economic concepts like efficiency. The focus on proportionality has become prominent in modern warfare discussions, shifting from seeking peace to prioritizing proportional actions. There is a concern that concentrating on proportionality as "second best" may not be ideal, and war has become commodified, lacking historical and contextual depth. The message advocates for addressing each war uniquely to find a way forward towards peace.
Vanities and inanities
DeepDipDebate ensues about the effectiveness of celebrity involvement in diplomacy and anti-poverty efforts. Dennis Rodman's recent visits to North Korea and Vatican City spark questions about the impact of such actions. Pundits' predictions are scrutinized for accuracy, highlighting the unpredictability of human behavior in novel situations. The limitations of using heuristics in unconventional scenarios are emphasized, suggesting that outcomes are uncertain and complex.
Cultural differences (a tale of prejudice)
DeepDipThe text reflects on cultural differences and prejudice seen in comments about a photo. It contrasts celebratory views of inventiveness with stigmatizing attitudes towards those perceived as "cheats" or undeserving of assistance. The writer questions the fairness of such judgments, highlighting societal divisions and the impact of stigmatization on human dignity.
Trent: the first multilateral negotiation
DeepDipThe Council of Trent (1545-1563) was likely the first multilateral negotiation, involving the Pope, Bishops, and representatives of major rulers to address Catholic doctrine and reform. Despite debates and disagreements, the Council established unifying canons but failed to reconcile with the Reformation fully. The assembly created procedural structures familiar in modern multilateral relations. While earlier councils condemned heretics, Trent used indirect approaches, akin to modern conflict resolution strategies. The Council's outcomes were notable for what was left undecided. The post-Council period saw varied reactions to its mandates, with ongoing efforts towards Church reform.
Sophie’s choice is no choice
DeepDipSophie's tragic "choice" at Auschwitz, where she had to decide which of her children would die, is not a genuine choice. The philosopher suggests using chance, like the ancient Greeks did, to make such impossible decisions, allowing for closure without overwhelming guilt. Truth, unlike fate, brings no closure but perpetuates anguish. Outsourcing decisions to randomness may alleviate guilt in devastating situations, as exemplified in the context of Sophie's unimaginable predicament.
The Swiss vote against corporate rip-off
DeepDipSwiss voters approved a constitutional initiative to address corporate governance issues like excessive management salaries and unfair deals. The new law mandates shareholder approval of executive pay and aims to prevent monopolies and asymmetries of information. While some opposed the measure as too restrictive, voters sought to ensure meaningful change beyond cosmetic adjustments by Parliament. The Swiss political system relies on strong direct democracy, with frequent voting on various issues to engage citizens and foster long-term stability. The referendum highlights the challenges of balancing direct and representative democracy in a diverse society like Switzerland.
Crowd-sourcing Italy’s future
DeepDipThe text discusses crowd-sourcing Italy's future through online petitions on "Change.org." It emphasizes the potential impact of signing petitions on shaping voter opinions and decision-making. Petitions are viewed as a way to combat false perceptions and create a sense of collective intentionality. The text also delves into the differences between traditional polling methods and the bottom-up, open-ended nature of petition systems. It highlights the transformative power of participatory democracy and the nuances in how individuals engage with and respond to petitions.
Pity the Pakicetus!
DeepDip50 million years ago, Pakicetus faced generational strife over their future. A conference was called to decide between land and sea living. Pakicetus Major proposed a third way, sparking applause. Working groups explored options, but the final decision remains unknown. This tale, coined as a true fairy tale, reflects on the species' struggle to adapt.