The 'Great Deplatforming' of Donald Trump was legally justified, though poses broader challenges and raises questions of consistency in social media moderation. While Trump's removal relieved platform pressure, many others continue to breach rules. The act also sparks concerns about political bias, potential victimization of Trump, and sets a dangerous precedent for online freedom of speech. Addressing the root issue of unregulated social media algorithms may be a more effective solution. The deplatforming debate highlights the need to balance freedom of speech with regulations on content promotion to mitigate misinformation spread.

The humanitarian aid sector needs to shift towards community ownership in aid responses, moving beyond unequal partnerships with international actors. Community organising, explored in a briefing paper, can empower crisis-affected individuals by involving them in decision-making processes. Examples like Citizens UK and Slum Dwellers International demonstrate the potential for grassroots ownership of international humanitarian action. While challenges exist in immediate crises, long-term approaches could transform aid delivery. Research aims to explore the untapped potential of community organising in the humanitarian aid sector for a more community-driven approach.

The TikTok app has surged in popularity during the pandemic, with concerns raised over its ties to China and data security issues. Despite the accusations, experts argue that TikTok's data practices are not significantly different from other social media platforms. The intense scrutiny reflects the broader global battle over data control and sovereignty. As China asserts its dominance in cyberspace, tensions rise over data protection and technology ownership, exemplified by the backlash against TikTok. The intertwining of technology and politics underscores the complex dynamics at play in the digital age, shaping international relations and security concerns.