Why AI will enhance, not replace, human diplomacy?

Published on 16 October 2024

Diplomacy is on the cusp of renewal in the age of artificial intelligence, and far from becoming redundant, it stands to flourish. Here’s why.

Diplomacy in the AI era: Human as ever

Diplomacy, at its core, is an inherently human endeavour—a nuanced combination of intelligence, empathy, and emotional awareness that empowers diplomats to represent, negotiate, and protect national interests. Unlike many other professions, diplomacy will be immune to the “automation onslaught” brought by AI. As a practice that is more art than science, deeply rooted in human experience and interaction, diplomacy is particularly resistant to technological automation.

While the fundamental purposes of diplomacy—representation, negotiation, and conflict resolution—remain unchanged, the methods diplomats use to fulfil these will change profoundly. AI can assist by analyzing data, automating reporting, and reducing the burden of bureaucratic tasks, allowing diplomats to focus more on engagement and persuasion.

In the future, diplomats will spend more time on face-to-face interactions—particularly with counterparts on opposing sides of geopolitical divides—rather than being tied to their screens.

The future of diplomacy in the AI era was one of the key themes during our discussions

 People, Person, Adult, Male, Man, Crowd, Face, Head, Accessories, Glasses, Audience, Tae Satoya

AI and loaded questions

Andrej Skrinjaric discussed the use of AI in language and diplomacy training.

 People, Person, Audience, Crowd, Indoors, Lecture, Room, Seminar, Adult, Female, Woman, Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone, Male, Man, Computer, Laptop, Pc, Accessories, Formal Wear, Tie, Jewelry, Necklace, Face, Head, Jason Rezaian, Marie Luise Neunecker, La Parka

AI reporting and protocol

Stefan Lazic presented the use of AI for diplomatic reporting and protocol.

 Adult, Female, Person, Woman, People, Crowd, Male, Man, Chair, Furniture, Face, Head, Audience, Wristwatch, Accessories, Glasses, Tom Mandrake, Mine Teber, Yu Mei-nu, Jiang Yu

AI pedagogy and training

Dragana Markovski discussed the impact of AI on pedagogy (training, simulations and evaluations).

 People, Person, Computer Hardware, Electronics, Hardware, Monitor, Screen, Adult, Female, Woman, Male, Man, Crowd, Head, Accessories, Glasses, Chair, Furniture, Computer, Laptop, Pc, Indoors, Audience, Face

AI and practice of diplomacy

Jovan Kurbalija discussed AI impact on geopolitics, negotiations and the practice of diplomacy.

In this text, you can find my reflections that substantiate the claim that diplomacy, as a human activity, will thrive in the AI era. I am looking forward to your comments and reflections!

History: A Resilient evolution of diplomacy

The history of diplomacy is a testament to its adaptability. From the invention of the telegraph to the rise of the internet, diplomacy has continually integrated new technologies while remaining a human-centred activity. AI, like the technologies that preceded it, will enhance diplomacy but will never replace what is irreplaceable—the human interaction and judgment that define the profession. The evolution of diplomacy is about harnessing technology to empower the people at its heart, not replacing them.

Negotiations: Art of deals over optimisation by algorithms

If negotiations were simply about finding optimal solutions, AI might excel at them. But negotiations are more than logical calculations; they are the complex, human art of compromise. Negotiation is more than reaching an optimal deal —it’s about navigating emotions, adapting on the fly, and understanding the subtleties beneath the surface of conflicts.

AI tools are already being developed to assist certain aspects of negotiations, from language translation to data analysis. However, the essence of successful negotiation is inherently human. It requires empathy, creativity, and the ability to build trust. As Nobel laureate and diplomat Ivo Andrić once said, qualities like versatility and the ability to value each unique moment are distinctively human traits. AI can assist, but it will not take the lead in negotiations, inherently human activity.

Representation: A human engagement

Diplomatic representation goes beyond conveying messages; it involves embodying a nation’s values, culture, and interests on the world stage. AI robots may welcome visitors at an embassy or answer questions via consular chatbots, but representing a country in its full complexity is a task reserved for humans. Understanding cultural nuances, navigating unspoken signals, and building long-lasting trust cannot be handed over to algorithms.

As long as humans are at the centre of social life on Earth, entities they form – currently national states – will be represented by humans.

Protection of national interests: Human judgement in time of crisis

Diplomats are responsible for protecting the interests of their countries and citizens abroad, especially during crises—an increasingly frequent occurrence in our interconnected world. Crises are unpredictable by their definition, and effective crisis management often demands rapid decision-making that directly impacts human lives. These decisions require intuition, empathy, and ethical considerations—qualities AI cannot easily mimic.

AI can support crisis response by running simulations, analyzing data in real-time, and suggesting contingency plans. However, when human lives are on the line, decision-making must remain in human hands. Protecting national interests, whether through crisis management or consular services, requires the uniquely human ability to respond to the unpredictable often under the pressure to make ethically complex decisions.

New opportunities: A shift from bureaucratic to real diplomacy

AI has the potential to free diplomats from bureaucratic tasks, such as reporting, and allow them to focus on “real” diplomacy—engaging with people, resolving conflicts, and building lasting relationships. This shift is not just about improving efficiency; it is about enhancing the quality of diplomatic interactions. By freeing up diplomats’ time, AI allows them to dedicate more energy to human-centred diplomacy—the essence of the profession.

As Umej Bhatia, Singapore’s ambassador to the UN in Geneva, aptly put it, “Texts written by AI can mimic authority without any substance. Contextual and situational judgment is crucial and cannot be provided by AI.” Diplomacy requires precisely that kind of judgment—adapting to the moment, grasping the deeper context, and building genuine connections.

Next Steps: Preparing diplomats for the AI transformation

AI will not end diplomacy—it will transform it. The key is preparation for this transformation. Diplomats must gather new AI competencies ranging from basic technological literacy to new ways of handling knowledge and information. Individual training must be supported by organisational changes. Ministries of foreign affairs should also evolve from currently rigid hierarchical structures to more dynamic, knowledge-driven networks between diplomats themselves and machines. At Diplo, we use the ‘cognitive proximity’ approach as a new way to integrate AI while preserving human-centred organisation.

AI is a powerful tool, but it is still just a tool. It must serve diplomacy, not replace it. The human element, with all its complexity and creativity, will ensure that diplomacy remains relevant in the AI era. As we step into this new chapter, the future of diplomacy looks bright precisely because it will continue to be a deeply human endeavour.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Subscribe to Diplo's Blog