Hierarchy is here to stay
Published on 17 January 2014
Updated on 19 March 2024
Updated on 19 March 2024
Among various ‘endisms’ associated with the Internet, the ‘end of hierarchy’ is one of the most repeated and enduring. Hundreds of articles and books have been written based on two false assumptions:
The first is that society was hierarchically organised till the invention of the Internet. This assumption ignores that – before the Internet – people used to network through schools, pubs, sports, families …. You name it, you have it.
The second is that with the arrival of the Internet, networking would replace hierarchy as the way society organised itself. This assumption is also false. In the Internet era, society has remained hierarchical. Hierarchy is not a retrograde or bureaucratic invention, but rather a core functional principle of nature and society as was elaborated in the works of Herbert Simon, a famous cognitive scientist and Nobel prize winner. Hierarchical structures run physical, biological, psychological, and social worlds.
Even simple observations can show that hierarchies not only exist, but are even stronger on the Internet than in the traditional world (note the dominant position of Silicon Valley in the Internet industry, leading bloggers, the number of likes as indicators of social acceptability, as well as the number of followers on Twitter).
Instead of proclaiming the ‘end of hierarchy’, we need to make hierarchies more transparent, more responsible, and more effective.
Elevators in these hierarchies should stop at as many levels of society as possible, moving people both up and down according to their merits.
Related blogs
Related events
Related resources
Subscribe to Diplo's Blog
Diplo: Effective and inclusive diplomacy
Diplo is a non-profit foundation established by the governments of Malta and Switzerland. Diplo works to increase the role of small and developing states, and to improve global governance and international policy development.
Want to stay up to date?
Subscribe to more Diplo and Geneva Internet Platform newsletters!
To Dr. Jovan Kurbalija`s
To Dr. Jovan Kurbalija`s cogent tripartite characterization of hierarchy , I would suggest the addtion
of dignifying. We live in the era of fast-paced,highly economical(succint)communication and this
further challenges communicators (at diferent organizational levels)to express themselves
dignifyingly. To know more about my view,please access
http://www.estudenaaba.com look for Mídia,then for ABA posters and click on English.On the list
of posters, it will be easy to access Communicative Dignity
Francisco Gomes de Matos, a Peace linguist from Recife,Brazil
A contributor to the DIPLO volume Language and Diplomacy.
Author of Dignity.A Multidimensional View,published by Dignity Press,2013 http://www.dignitypress.org
Thank you Francisco for this
Thank you Francisco for this additonal point. I will have a look at suggested materials.
I strongly agree with Dr.
I strongly agree with Dr. Jovan Kurbalija on this subject but more interesting is ” ….Instead of proclaiming the ‘end of hierarchy’, we need to make hierarchies more transparent, more responsible, and more effective..” and “Elevators in these hierarchies should stop at as many levels of society as possible, moving people both up and down according to their merits”
Why ? …cause this is a big challenge in almost many organizations, societies to obverse ” moving people both up and down according to their merits” especially in the developing countries.
Hamisi, it is not only the
Hamisi, it is not only the case in developing countries. Institutions can help in making ‘elevator movements’ more merit-based. We often forget that a solid institutions (rule of law, predictability, etc.) are one of the reasons why Silicon Valley is so prosperous. The first step is to recognise reality and stop academic confusion on ‘networking society’ and ‘end of hierarchy’. Next step is to make hierarchies serve better interests of society.