Note: This article is a part of the publication ‘Science diplomacy capacity development: Reflections on Diplo’s 2021 course and the road ahead’
Diplo has a track record of more than 20 years of capacity development in diplomacy. Given the increasing relevance of science diplomacy, expanding our program to include aspects of its theory and practice felt like an organic development. We offered our ten-week Science Diplomacy course for the first time in October 2021.
Our Science Diplomacy course builds on a number of conversations in our Diplo WebDebate format (DiploFoundation, 2022a, 2022b) and research conducted in conversation with practitioners at CERN (The European Organization for Nuclear Research), which led to reflections on suitable institutional frameworks and effective capacity development for Science Diplomacy (Höne and Kurbalija, 2018). At its core, our 2021 course is a collaborative effort.
We partnered with two Geneva-based organizations, the Geneva Science and Diplomacy Anticipator (GESDA) and the Geneva Science-Policy Interface (GSPI). GESDA and GSPI provided course materials and co-lectured on the course. Both Diplo and course participants benefited tremendously from this cooperation. Furthermore, this and other initiatives, such as the Science Diplomacy Week (Jefford, 2022), highlight the importance of collaboration on Science Diplomacy within the Geneva ecosystem.
The lecture team was completed by Dr Tim Flink who brought his rich experience as a Science Diplomacy researcher and offered the important ability to separate hype from reality when it comes to the practice of Science Diplomacy. Reaching across the Atlantic, Diplo US partnered with the National Science Policy Network as part of their Science Diplomacy Exchange and Learning (SciDEAL) program. This meant that we worked with five NSPN SciDEAL fellows over the course of 2021 to develop course materials and to have conversations on the nature and utility of Science Diplomacy. The fellows brought their knowledge and skills in the ‘hard’ sciences and science policy to the table and developed them further in conversation with us and with our course participants.
Speaking of collaboration, our course participants also need to be mentioned. Diplo’s learning methodology is collaborative at its core and places joint knowledge construction as its highest value. This course brought together a cohort of 21 participants that came from both science and diplomacy, covering a wide range of scientific specialisations. Bringing diplomats and scientists together in the same course was an important element contributing to joint knowledge construction. Moreover, the diversity of backgrounds meant that participants were experts in some areas while completely new to other areas of Science Diplomacy, which led to further mutual learning experiences. The 100% course completion rate is a testament to their dedication.
In the following, you will find reflections from the course lecturers, the NSPN SciDEAL fellows, and, most importantly, course participants. For us, it was crucial to bring everyone together while the course was still fresh in their minds and ask for reflections on capacity development in Science Diplomacy and future directions of Science Diplomacy.
Course participants in particular reflected on how to integrate the lessons from the course into their work. For some, the course even provided the impetus to re-adjust the future trajectory of their career. In particular, the concept of ‘boundary spanning’, which describes bridging the policy and scientific spheres to facilitate research and increase policy impact (Gustafsson and Lidskog, 2018), proved to be useful for many participants in orienting their future plans.
For Diplo, delivering this course provided a lot of inspiration and motivation to keep engaging in capacity development in Science Diplomacy. The prominence of the topic has been steadily increasing over the last ten years and we find that the various tools and knowledge offered under the umbrella of Science Diplomacy are crucial in addressing some of the most pressing problems of our planet and our time. Nevertheless, we are also mindful of the trap of hype around Science Diplomacy (Kurbalija, 2022), which bears the danger of emptying it of meaning. It is precisely this balancing act that we want to get right with our future science diplomacy capacity development.
You may also be interested in
Knowledge management and diplomacy
In this paper we aim to provide a comprehensive introduction to the topic of knowledge management in diplomacy. First we provide working definitions of knowledge and knowledge management, and examine the evolution of the concepts. Next, we consider specific features of diplomacy that affect and limit the way knowledge management can be implemented. Then we look at specific techniques which diplomacy can adapt from the business sector in the field of knowledge management. Finally, we consider some important questions related to human resources and knowledge management.
How do you know what you think you know?
In his paper, J. Thomas Converse focuses on four records-related areas where the issues of knowledge management and diplomacy come together and provide the greatest challenges to archivists, diplomats, historians and technology providers: validation, trustworthiness, context and longevity. He also explores some of the changes and challenges brought about by technology, and urges for a continued embrace of technology, while at the same time demanding the validating and relational functions which give archives their trustworthiness.
Science diplomacy capacity development
Diplo has a track record of more than 20 years of capacity development in diplomacy. Given the increasing relevance of science diplomacy, expanding our program to include aspects of its theory and practice felt like an organic development. We offered our ten-week Science Diplomacy course for the first time in October 2021.
Knowledge management and diplomatic training – new approaches for training institutions
Dietrich Kappeler analyses the new approaches for training institutions in knowledge management and diplomatic training, departing from the premise that a distinction is important between personal characteristics and qualities of the diplomat on one hand, and the knowledge and skills he needs to do his job on the other.
DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats
On Diplo’s blog, in Diplo’s classrooms, and at Diplo’s events, dialogues stretch over a series of entries, comments, and exchanges and may even linger. DiploDialogue summarises. It’s like in sports events: DiploDialogue aims to bring focus by deleting what, in hindsight, is less relevant. In this first DiploDialogue, Katharina Höne and Aldo Matteucci discuss the usefulness of analogies and metaphors for understanding international relations and diplomacy.
Knowledge management: experience from international organisations
In this chapter, John Pace decribes the three-phase evolution of knowledge management in the human rights program of the United Nations. The realisation that knowledge management is a necessity came during the third phase. The author also describes the complex system of monitoring bodies and ad hoc mechanisms, and the developments that took place following four decisions taken in the mid-eighties.
The role of knowledge in the cyber-age of globalisation
In his paper, Richard Falk reflects on the application of information technology on diplomacy, and discusses the challenge of converting information technology to ‘knowledge technology’, and subsequently to ‘wisdom technology’. Yet, the ‘crossroads in human experience’ brings many challenges and dangers which the author analyses.
Knowledge and Diplomacy
Knowledge and Diplomacy presents papers on knowledge and knowledge management from the January 1999 Conference on Knowledge and Diplomacy in Malta. The papers in this book, examining the topic from a variety of backgrounds, academic interests and orientations, reflect the multidisciplinary character of knowledge management. This publication is only available online.
Knowledge management in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Malta
In this paper, Maltese diplomat Gaetan Naudi explains how the Maltese MFA embraced the changes introduced by the informatics era. He looks at such changes from a business management perspective, to show how ICTs were introduced to such a fairly large organisation, the concerns raised by the changes, and the progress on computerised knowledge management. He concludes that despite the positive changes introduced thanks to ICTs, this would not have been possible without human involvement.
Knowledge management and international development – the role of diplomacy
In this chapter, Walter Fust talks about the role of knowledge management, and knowledge for development, in diplomacy. He describes various methods to assess what knowledge should be stocked, and explains the need for managers who are assigned the task of deciding what should be stocked. These decisions need to be guided by principles, or guidelines - referred to as value management.
Science & Diplomacy: How countries interact with the Boston innovation ecosystem
Crucial global topics are becoming increasingly dependent on the world’s rapidly changing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities: from global health to digital society, sustainability to development, and beyond. To tackle this growing complexity, countries increasingly seek to engage with international science and technology hubs like Boston, so as to accelerate their ability to innovate and spark collaborative efforts with other nations.
Knowledge and Diplomacy – Alex Sceberras Trigona
In his paper, Alex Sceberras Trigona stresses the importance of the diplomatic document as a primary source of diplomatic knowledge, in the light of the distinction between ‘information’ (can be recorded) and knowledge (not easily recorded), the flow of knowledge as information. He then explains the need for dissecting diplomatic documents, and the various level of analysis which are possible, and the effects of digitalisation on knowledge, information and diplomacy.
Knowledge management and change in international organisations: Learning from the private sector
In this paper, John Harper and Jennifer Cassingena Harper talk about knowledge as a vital resource, and the necessity of building competencies and establishing new skills. Analysing the theories by Ernst B. Haas in When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organisation, the authors trace the development of knowledge-oriented activities in the private sector, and its implications for organisations in the public and international domain.
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
In his paper, Robert Alston travels through time to rekindle an important highlight – as well as a personal highlight – in the history of knowledge management. His journey takes him back to the 1850s, which saw Antonio Panizzi’s efforts in creating a universal repository of knowledge in the British Museum; and to the 1990s, a time in which he acquired first-hand experience at the same museum, drawing conclusions on the various available ways of navigating large bibliographical and archival databases.
