Note: This article is a part of the publication ‘Science diplomacy capacity development: Reflections on Diplo’s 2021 course and the road ahead’
From the moment that I learned about Diplo’s mission of supporting the United Nations’ (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs) through stronger science-diplomacy coordination, I knew that I wanted to get involved. The experience did not disappoint. Creating a science-diplomacy course with other passionate and knowledgeable scientists from different fields under the guidance of experts in international diplomacy, Katharina Höne and Pavlina Ittelson, was thought-provoking, illuminating, and enjoyable. The different modules covered global health, renewable energy, climate, and ecosystems respectively, and were each written by a scientist with expertise in that topic.
The collaborative objectives of this project spoke to my own personal and professional priorities, as a scientist and as a citizen of the world. With an international upbringing, spanning four states and three countries, I understand the interconnected dependency of our global community. Witnessing devastating pollution and flooding in the developing world during my formative years highlighted the urgent need to protect society from preventable disasters by reaching across divides. Having family across the globe, I view international cooperation as indispensable to producing equitable, constructive, and durable solutions to our shared challenges. Our team’s collaborative sessions provided an exchange of valuable perspectives and improved our knowledge, assumptions, and communication styles.
While weaving my atmospheric and climate knowledge together with the history of international environmental efforts for this module, I was able to gain and share new insights into the history of science-diplomacy including its successes and set-backs. Particularly, delving into case-studies of regional climate efforts for the training module provided our team and the course participants with concrete examples of achievable climate progress through science-diplomacy. It was especially gratifying to observe participants engaging with the module text as they shared many valuable and relevant insights from their own regions and experiences.
Going forward, I hope to continue building on this work by remaining involved in the science-diplomacy and science-policy interface. Unprecedented challenges such as the current global pandemic and the climate crisis are glaring examples of the urgent and consistent need for ‘science in diplomacy’ for our shared well-being. While past educational and professional systems have separately siloed science and diplomacy work, I hope that this project has strengthened the science-diplomacy bidirectional pipeline for the module authors and course participants.
As an atmospheric scientist, I am particularly aware that the earth is a closed system, meaning that any perturbations to the climate balance will affect the entire globe. This means that the climate crisis is a shared challenge that requires an immediate, sustained, unified, global effort across professional expertise, international boundaries, and political divides, for generations to come. Navigating these disparate perspectives will require skilled professionals who are trained to work at the science-diplomacy interface.
The collaborative project of producing this science-diplomacy course and its modules has invited the expertise of scientists into the diplomatic conversation, while also providing participating scientists with insights into translating relevant science into useful, timely, and targeted language to reach the intended audience. I believe that the experience that our team and participants gained through the collaborative effort of producing and sharing this training module on climate change will strengthen public trust in science and our collective contributions toward the interrelated objectives of the UN SDGs.
You may also be interested in
DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats
On Diplo’s blog, in Diplo’s classrooms, and at Diplo’s events, dialogues stretch over a series of entries, comments, and exchanges and may even linger. DiploDialogue summarises. It’s like in sports events: DiploDialogue aims to bring focus by deleting what, in hindsight, is less relevant. In this first DiploDialogue, Katharina Höne and Aldo Matteucci discuss the usefulness of analogies and metaphors for understanding international relations and diplomacy.
Knowledge management and change in international organisations: Learning from the private sector
In this paper, John Harper and Jennifer Cassingena Harper talk about knowledge as a vital resource, and the necessity of building competencies and establishing new skills. Analysing the theories by Ernst B. Haas in When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organisation, the authors trace the development of knowledge-oriented activities in the private sector, and its implications for organisations in the public and international domain.
Knowledge and Diplomacy – Alex Sceberras Trigona
In his paper, Alex Sceberras Trigona stresses the importance of the diplomatic document as a primary source of diplomatic knowledge, in the light of the distinction between ‘information’ (can be recorded) and knowledge (not easily recorded), the flow of knowledge as information. He then explains the need for dissecting diplomatic documents, and the various level of analysis which are possible, and the effects of digitalisation on knowledge, information and diplomacy.
Science diplomacy capacity development
Diplo has a track record of more than 20 years of capacity development in diplomacy. Given the increasing relevance of science diplomacy, expanding our program to include aspects of its theory and practice felt like an organic development. We offered our ten-week Science Diplomacy course for the first time in October 2021.
How do you know what you think you know?
In his paper, J. Thomas Converse focuses on four records-related areas where the issues of knowledge management and diplomacy come together and provide the greatest challenges to archivists, diplomats, historians and technology providers: validation, trustworthiness, context and longevity. He also explores some of the changes and challenges brought about by technology, and urges for a continued embrace of technology, while at the same time demanding the validating and relational functions which give archives their trustworthiness.
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
In his paper, Robert Alston travels through time to rekindle an important highlight – as well as a personal highlight – in the history of knowledge management. His journey takes him back to the 1850s, which saw Antonio Panizzi’s efforts in creating a universal repository of knowledge in the British Museum; and to the 1990s, a time in which he acquired first-hand experience at the same museum, drawing conclusions on the various available ways of navigating large bibliographical and archival databases.
Knowledge management: experience from international organisations
In this chapter, John Pace decribes the three-phase evolution of knowledge management in the human rights program of the United Nations. The realisation that knowledge management is a necessity came during the third phase. The author also describes the complex system of monitoring bodies and ad hoc mechanisms, and the developments that took place following four decisions taken in the mid-eighties.
Knowledge and Diplomacy
Knowledge and Diplomacy presents papers on knowledge and knowledge management from the January 1999 Conference on Knowledge and Diplomacy in Malta. The papers in this book, examining the topic from a variety of backgrounds, academic interests and orientations, reflect the multidisciplinary character of knowledge management. This publication is only available online.
Knowledge management and diplomacy
In this paper we aim to provide a comprehensive introduction to the topic of knowledge management in diplomacy. First we provide working definitions of knowledge and knowledge management, and examine the evolution of the concepts. Next, we consider specific features of diplomacy that affect and limit the way knowledge management can be implemented. Then we look at specific techniques which diplomacy can adapt from the business sector in the field of knowledge management. Finally, we consider some important questions related to human resources and knowledge management.
The role of knowledge in the cyber-age of globalisation
In his paper, Richard Falk reflects on the application of information technology on diplomacy, and discusses the challenge of converting information technology to ‘knowledge technology’, and subsequently to ‘wisdom technology’. Yet, the ‘crossroads in human experience’ brings many challenges and dangers which the author analyses.
Knowledge management in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Malta
In this paper, Maltese diplomat Gaetan Naudi explains how the Maltese MFA embraced the changes introduced by the informatics era. He looks at such changes from a business management perspective, to show how ICTs were introduced to such a fairly large organisation, the concerns raised by the changes, and the progress on computerised knowledge management. He concludes that despite the positive changes introduced thanks to ICTs, this would not have been possible without human involvement.
Knowledge management and international development – the role of diplomacy
In this chapter, Walter Fust talks about the role of knowledge management, and knowledge for development, in diplomacy. He describes various methods to assess what knowledge should be stocked, and explains the need for managers who are assigned the task of deciding what should be stocked. These decisions need to be guided by principles, or guidelines - referred to as value management.
Knowledge management and diplomatic training – new approaches for training institutions
Dietrich Kappeler analyses the new approaches for training institutions in knowledge management and diplomatic training, departing from the premise that a distinction is important between personal characteristics and qualities of the diplomat on one hand, and the knowledge and skills he needs to do his job on the other.
Science & Diplomacy: How countries interact with the Boston innovation ecosystem
Crucial global topics are becoming increasingly dependent on the world’s rapidly changing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities: from global health to digital society, sustainability to development, and beyond. To tackle this growing complexity, countries increasingly seek to engage with international science and technology hubs like Boston, so as to accelerate their ability to innovate and spark collaborative efforts with other nations.
